Basierend auf 15 Bewertungen gefunden auf 1 Websites
Basierend auf 15 Bewertungen gefunden auf 1 Websites
Nº 38 unter 47 unter Neckarsulm
Nº 20 von 23 Restaurant unter Neckarsulm
Stellungnahmen
Meat is not cooked through during peak hours
Justus Jonas . 2023-03-12
WEITERE KOMMENTARE IN Google
Staff is friendly, the food was below average. Goes better...
Fabian Krebs . 2020-01-03
WEITERE KOMMENTARE IN Google
The staff is very friendly and accommodating, but the food is below average and has no taste.
Michael Pötter . 2019-06-01
WEITERE KOMMENTARE IN Google
Diese Zeiten sind an besonderen Tagen möglicherweise nicht ganz genau. Bitte fragen Sie immer im Restaurant nach
Ähnliche Restaurants in Neckarsulm
870 Stellungnahmen
Cozy restaurant. Great service. Good food or yeast wheat. Daily dish lentils spaetzle Viennese for 9.90. Portion large enough. Great taste.
6 Stellungnahmen
The pizza was a bit thin, but tasted absolutely fine. However, I ordered and paid for two and only received one. To date - almost 6 weeks after the purchase - I have not received the money back, not even an answer to my two inquiries. Too bad.
413 Stellungnahmen
We were there for Christmas dinner with 18 people. Despite the full restaurant, we got both drinks and food very quickly and, above all, together. The food was very tasty and plentiful. Plus a very friendly staff! We'd love to come back ;-)
27 Stellungnahmen
Super tasty food and generous portions. Probably the best schnitzel in the Unterland. I can only recommend it.
37 Stellungnahmen
Just read it at consumer info-bw.de: During the inspection, numerous and sometimes significant violations of food law were discovered. Overall, the company was very dirty. During the inspection, coarse bratwursts were found that were five days past their use-by date, as well as cracked eggs that were supposed to be put on the market. Suspicious samples were then collected and sent to the Stuttgart Chemical and Veterinary Investigation Office for assessment. In reports dated March 20 and 25, 2024, the samples were judged to be unsuitable for human consumption. In the “cracked eggs” sample, mold and yeast infestation was found, among other things. In addition, various sausages, meat and unwashed vegetables were stored openly together. The sausages were also stored at a temperature that was 1.7°C too high. Cooking was also carried out in a barn and food stored in the open was treated. However, the barn extension generally did not meet the legal requirements because it was contaminated and the structural equipment was not in a well-maintained condition or, in some cases, non-existent. For example, no installation of a hand basin for hygienic hand washing could be identified. There were also a large number of cobwebs in the ceiling and wall areas. Glass wool (insulating material) was exposed on the ceiling area above the stove. Various cables were sticking out of the ceiling area. There was therefore a risk of adverse influence or contamination of the food produced in the company.