Die besten Restaurants mit Asiatisches restaurant Essen in Nordrhein-Westfalen

I ordered the Thai Fried Noodles that has only vegetables and herbs in the description and it arrived along with chicken. I tried explaining it to the restaurant, but the person on telephone was very rude and told us not to order from there again.

"The staff was very unfriendly - one employee spoke to the customers in a strange tone. The food was tasty, but I give 0 points for the service."

Unfortunately, the taste and delivery time are subpar. Definitely one of the top 3 worst sushi in the entire city. Don't buy...

The food was OK. But nothing more. Fried noodles felt like they were cooked too long and not fried much. Vegetables were delicious. Breaded chicken too. There are better and worse options for Asian food in MG.

Everything is prepared correctly and tastes wonderful

Astrein noodle box with chicken very tasty, always the best Chinese snack

Noodles taste okay, but are just boiled rather than fried. Chicken seems cheap and costs 3 euros more when breaded, for whatever reason. Spicy sauce but very tasty.

Incredibly disgusting food. My husband had fried noodles that weren't cooked through, I had fried rice, totally disgusting and salty where I discovered the hair. Then it was too much for me and I had my food returned by my husband and got my money back. Of course I will pass it on to the health department because it looks like it's not the first time...

Addendum based on the request from the owner: Just try the “Thai Curry” yourself and apply a little criticism of your own. It just doesn't taste like anything. I expected it to taste something like the one from Asia Gourmet, but unfortunately the dish at Food of Asia had nothing to do with Asia. I ordered Thai with rice and chicken in large. The answer was that two portions of rice were put on my plate and an extra €1.50 was charged, so it cost almost €12. There was no taste. The chicken was poor quality. Unfortunately a big disappointment for the price. If it had cost €6, I wouldn't have given a rating, but the price-performance ratio was just so bad that it had to be.