Die besten Restaurants in Riedstadt

Beware of anyone looking for a snack stand on the Google map: This kiosk is not open to the public! It's on the grounds of a water park whose entrance fees alone are outrageous (€6 per half hour, €65 for a day ticket, attractions not included - and that's for a small park in the middle of nowhere). An inaccessible kiosk has no place on the Google map. Edit: After the "friendly" answer from the owner, who obviously didn't understand what the problem was and apparently preferred to invest his mental capacity in arrogance, I would like to add the following: With a swimming pool kiosk, you expect it to be in the swimming pool, with you “Kiosk am Riedsee” but simply means that it is simply located on Riedsee. Google Maps does not show that the kiosk is within a paid park; This is also not visible in the pictures. Annoying for everyone who deviates from the bike path to eat there based on Google reviews and then cycles 10km for nothing. This inadequate labeling is my point of criticism here. Regarding the point “surely you would have gotten something to eat”: Do you expect people to let you in free of charge to eat at the swimming pool kiosk? Probably not, so this statement is complete nonsense, just like the car comparison, which ignores the fact that you need a car to drive a car, but you usually don't need a ticket to a park to eat. And another edit in response to the suggestion offered by the owner: Unfortunately, the "those who know us and come from the area..." chatter doesn't work here. I'm not from the area and, as I said, I would never ask for free entry in a swimming pool (or perhaps more appropriately priced in Phantasialand) in order to be able to eat at a kiosk. A regulation in this regard is unusual and is not mentioned anywhere online or on site (incidentally, I find it strange that you only mention this regulation in the addendum). Just put up a sign and everyone will know. Attacking me for acting like a normal person doesn't look good on you. Treat your ego, finally read the review completely and understand it as it was intended: not as an attack on your company but as a justified criticism of inadequate labeling, be it regarding the inaccessibility you dispute or regarding the special regulation. Although everyone in the area may know this (if it exists), people passing through may not. A small note about your “astonishment” at my “hour-long” comment. I don't know how long it would take you to write a few words, but an hour is a huge exaggeration. In addition, my review is only so long because your subterranean answer and exaggerated rhetoric almost demanded clarification. During my first edit, I actually thought that you simply didn't understand the essence of my criticism and that further explanation could help you. However, criticism seems to fall on barren ground for you.